Tag Archive for CMS

Seniors Parade to Preventative Care

preventative care

While many may be marching off to a local Memorial Day parade, a record number of seniors are jumping on the preventative care band wagon.  CMS announced today that 12.1 million Medicare beneficiaries used free preventative care in the first quarter of 2012.

Over 26 million people in traditional Medicare received free preventative services in all of 2011, so today’s announcement reveals seniors are on track to surpass even last year’s numbers.  Prior to 2011, beneficiaries were subject to co-pays and deductibles for many of these services including things like cancer screening and smoking cessation counseling.  Cost is now less of an obstacle for seniors who are interested in finding and treating illness early.

One of the mandates of the ACA (Affordable Care Act) was to eliminate many cost sharing barriers for beneficiaries to obtaining preventative care.  As a result, a new expanded list of screenings and services designed to help identify and detect early disease, was made available to Medicare recipients cost free.

CMS announced that, from January through April of this year, 12.1 million Medicare beneficiaries have already received at least one of these preventative services – including over 856,000 who have taken advantage of the Annual Wellness Visit that is now provided at no cost.

Do you know what screenings are offered? Learn more about Medicare Preventative Services and Procedures.

Have you received any preventative services in 2012? Share with us.

Ride the Medicare Advantage Roller Coaster

Enrollment Goes up and Premiums Go Down In 2011

11.3 million of the 46 million Medicare beneficiaries are cheering, because President Obama announced premiums for Medicare Advantage plans will be less costly next year. Meanwhile, enrollment next year should go up 5%.

MA plans (or Part C) are run by private insurance carriers but partially paid for by the government. They are more comprehensive plans than traditional Medicare. In additional to inpatient hospital or skilled nursing facility stays, MA plans also have dental and eye care. Medicare plans don’t have these extras, and Medicare recipients either do without these services or pay full price.

This news comes as a surprise because just yesterday, it was announced that premium costs for privately purchased individual and family insurance plans have gone up in the past year, and will likely continue to rise.  The New York Times reports that “…commercial insurance premiums for many people under 65 and many small businesses are increasing 10 percent to 25 percent or more.”

More surprising is the MA Plans will offer some additional benefits to seniors, as required by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. These include an end to a cap on lifetime coverage. Some ‘luxury’ benefits such as discounted gym memberships, are gone.

“Despite the claims of some, Medicare Advantage remains strong and a robust option for millions of seniors who choose to enroll or stay in a participating plan today and in the future,” Donald Berwick, head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), said in a statement. “The Affordable Care Act gave us new authority to negotiate with health plans in a competitive marketplace. As a result, our beneficiaries will save money and maintain their benefits.”

In other words, the government strong-armed private industry to not increase the premiums or cost sharing, even though CMS reimbursements increase was well below the medical trend costs.

The health care reform law gave power to CMS to reject potentially new plans, and also gave them the ability to negotiate with insurance carriers over the benefits of their MA products.  Medicare officials said they rejected 7 plans offered by 3 companies, but most insurers re-jiggered close to 300 plans to be acceptable to the government. The most common rejected proposal included an increase to seniors’ out of pocket expenses that created a profit for the insurance carrier.

This is good for the consumers, short-term, for sure. They get more services for less money. But in the long run, will it last?

Fighting Medicare Fraud

Medicare Fraud Identity Theft

Medicare Fraud Identity Theft

One issue plaguing the Medicare reforms is Medicare fraud. Every year, both seniors and the government lose quality health care and billions of dollars to corrupt providers.  Medicare fraud isn’t new (see my previous blogs on fraud and scams), but as the new health care reforms have passed, fraud has been in the spotlight. Medicare fraud affects everyone, from the government to seniors to taxpayers.

Cutting costs for health care is integral to health care reform. According to the United States government, taxpayers lose over 60 billion dollars every year due to Medicare fraud.  The government uses taxpayer money to finance Medicare, so when people abuse the system, it is the taxpayers who pay the price.

South Florida is the hotbed of these schemes, full of phantom pharmacies and providers, where criminals can earn tremendous amounts of money by cheating the government. Scammers sometimes purchase businesses like pharmacies, along with Medicare licenses and patient records, and use that information to charge Medicare for drugs and other services. According to a report by ABC news, one man’s Medicare card was used to purchase two prosthetic legs—even though the man had both of his legs, Medicare was slow to respond. Because Medicare moves very slowly, even when dealing with something like fraud, it is easy for con men to get away with their crimes.

Con men and fraudsters aren’t the only ones to participate in Medicare fraud schemes. Some corrupt health care providers overcharge Medicare for certain services that may or may have been performed improperly. Not only does this swindle the government out of millions of dollars, but also can harm the health of Medicare beneficiaries.  Most doctors and other providers are not involved in any of these scams, but the minority who do fraudulently charge Medicare waste government cash and harm senior health.

Preventing Medicare fraud could save the government—and taxpayers—billions of dollars annually, making it imperative to crack down on scammers and corrupt providers.  In the current system, responses to fraud are often slow and cumbersome, with little action taken. When Medicare cracked down on fraudulent equipment sales in South Florida, Medicare durable medical equipment claims dropped by $1.76 billion. By making more of an effort to combat fraud, it will be possible to save billions of dollars.

Recently the Department of Health and Human Services proposed that individual workers found responsible for Medicare fraud should be removed from the Medicare program.  Currently, only people who are still working for a company convicted of Medicare fraud can be excluded from the program, so employees can leave the company in order to evade exclusion.  Two Representatives from Florida proposed legislation that cracks down on individual executives, preventing them from working with Medicare after they have been convicted.

President Obama plans to sign a memo that would create a “do not fraud” list to combat Medicare fraud.  Consequently, the government would not send payments to deceased people, suspended contractors, or other delinquents to cut down on fraudulent payments. According to the Washington Post, within a three year time span, CMS sent approximately $182 million to dead people. CMS will use an online tool that will detect fraud, and provide more comprehensive background tests on providers, hoping to cut down on fake payments.

In general, I feel that the crackdown on such scams will be beneficial to the Medicare system. By preventing employees responsible for fraud from again working with Medicare, and keeping more detailed records of payments and providers, the government can save billions of dollars that will be better used elsewhere.  Hopefully these measures will improve the current health care environment in the United States.

CMS and MIPPA Rules

After going through another Medicare Annual Enrollment season, it is hard to believe just how many rules are listed and enforced by CMS. You can read the rules on CMS’s website, but below is a taste for some of these rules:

The following are considered “unsolicited contacts and in violation of MIPPA:”

  • Generally, use of old lists or consents to satisfy the new MIPPA rules regarding unsolicited contacts
  • Referrals of beneficiaries and/or their contact information resulting in an unsolicited contact are prohibited by the new guidance.
  • Members who are voluntarily disenrolling from a plan should not be contacted for sales purposes or be asked to consent in any formant to further sales contacts

Provider Marketing

It is “inappropriate for providers to be involved in any of the following actions”:

  • offering sales/appointment forms,
  • mailing marketing materials on behalf of plans,
  • making phone calls or steering beneficiaries, in any way, to a limited number of plans

Senator Baucus and CMS Slam Humana

In light of the recent letters sent out to their Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, insurance company Humana now faces the possibility of heavy fines and may even be kicked out of the Medicare Advantage market by federal healthcare agency, CMS. This seems like a pretty harsh penalty for a one page letter informing seniors that “health reform proposals being considered in Washington, D.C., this summer include billions in Medicare Advantage funding cuts” and that “millions of seniors and disabled individuals could lose many of the important benefits and services that make Medicare Advantage health plans so valuable.” So why is CMS so up in arms?

At the urging of Senate Finance chairman Max Baucus who describes Humana’s letters as “mislead[ing] seniors regarding the subject,” CMS ordered Humana to stop sending out such letters. Both Baucus and CMS have put a warning to Humana and any other insurer that might get mixed up in health care reform politics, Baucus stating “it is wholly unacceptable for insurance companies to mislead seniors,” but, as the Wall Street Journal points out, “Humana merely made the mistake of trying to tell seniors the truth about what will happen to their coverage.”

CMS does not currently have a model for how insurance companies should respond to health care politics but, clearly, attempting to inform your current customers is not allowed. It should be noted that Humana has been extremely supportive of health care reform, save these changes to Medicare Advantage, despite all the fingers pointed at the insurance companies and their growing reputation as the “bad guys.” Finally, Humana attempts to defend itself through these letters, pointing out that if benefits were to be cut, it is not a consequence of Humana’s actions, but of the government. But Humana gets slammed.

Rather than arguing over words, Senator Baucus should set reimbursement levels for Humana and other managed care providers, so that they perform the way they were intended to! Save the government and taxpayers money, while offering high quality health plans. Humana should stop the clumsy PR campaign and defend their program with how they help taxpayers and beneficiaries—not simply scaring their members—be their claims true or not.

CMS Will Not Pay for CT Colonography

A colonoscopy is known to be very uncomfortable procedures that check for lesions on the body. A virtual version, or virtual colonoscopy, is beginning to be used in order to make the procedure more comfortable and less invasive. The virtual colonoscopy procedure, also known as CT colonography, is an X-ray of the colon instead of the invasive scope and camera that is inserted into the body.

Last week, Medicare and Medicaid decided that they will not pay for the less invasive colon exam. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said, “We have determined that there is insufficient evidence on the test characteristics and performance of screening CT colonography in Medicare-aged individuals, and that the evidence is not sufficient to conclude that screening CT colonography improves health benefits for asymptomatic, average-risk Medicare beneficiaries.”

Supporters of the virtual version claim that this decision could cost patients’ lives while others approve the decision. Dr. Robert Fletcher, a professor at Harvard Medical School, agrees with CMS’s decision. He does believe that the CT colonography is accurate but he also stated that if something suspicious was to be found with the virtual colonoscopy, doctors would then have to go in the traditional way making the patient have two difficult exams instead of one uncomfortable one.

The CT colonography procedure is supported by the American Cancer Society, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American College of Radiology. They are disappointed with the decision because clinical studies have shown the CT colonography to be just as effective for the detection of early cancers and lesions.